The 6.5x47 Lapua remains a popular choice among long-range shooters, but is it still a good round in today's market? The answer is a resounding yes, but with some important caveats. This article delves into the strengths and weaknesses of the 6.5x47 Lapua, examining its performance, applications, and comparisons to newer cartridges to determine its continued relevance in the world of precision shooting.
Why the 6.5x47 Lapua Maintained its Popularity
The 6.5x47 Lapua's enduring popularity stems from several key features that continue to make it a strong contender:
-
Exceptional Accuracy: This cartridge is renowned for its exceptional accuracy, often achieving sub-MOA (minute of angle) groups at long ranges. The consistent, high-quality Lapua brass contributes significantly to this accuracy. Many competitive shooters and long-range hunters rely on this precision.
-
Flat Trajectory: Its relatively flat trajectory allows for easier ranging and holds at longer distances, minimizing the need for significant adjustments between shots. This is especially valuable for hunters and target shooters seeking consistent performance.
-
Reduced Recoil: Compared to larger calibers like .300 Win Mag, the 6.5x47 Lapua produces noticeably less recoil. This makes it more comfortable to shoot for extended periods, improving accuracy and reducing shooter fatigue. This feature is a significant advantage for precision shooting.
-
High BC Bullets: The 6.5mm caliber allows for the use of high ballistic coefficient (BC) bullets, which retain velocity and energy over longer distances. This translates to a flatter trajectory, reduced wind drift, and increased effectiveness at extended ranges.
-
Versatile Applications: The 6.5x47 Lapua excels in both hunting and target shooting applications. Its moderate recoil makes it suitable for hunting various game animals, while its accuracy makes it ideal for long-range target competitions.
Analyzing the 6.5x47 Lapua's Drawbacks
Despite its strengths, the 6.5x47 Lapua does have some drawbacks to consider:
-
Cost: Lapua brass and factory ammunition are relatively expensive compared to other cartridges. This can be a significant factor for those on a tighter budget. Reloading is a viable option to mitigate this cost.
-
Case Capacity: While offering excellent accuracy, the case capacity is slightly smaller than some competing rounds, potentially limiting maximum velocity potential.
-
Barrel Wear: The high pressures generated can contribute to increased barrel wear, necessitating more frequent barrel replacements compared to lower-pressure cartridges.
Comparing the 6.5x47 Lapua to Competitors
The 6.5 Creedmoor has emerged as a strong competitor, offering a similar ballistic profile at a lower cost. However, the 6.5x47 Lapua generally maintains a slight edge in accuracy and case life due to its superior brass quality and design.
| Feature | 6.5x47 Lapua | 6.5 Creedmoor |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | Excellent | Very Good |
| Recoil | Low | Low |
| Cost | High | Moderate |
| Case Life | High | Moderate |
| Barrel Wear | Higher | Lower |
| Velocity | Slightly Higher | Slightly Lower |
This table highlights the key differences between these two popular 6.5mm cartridges. The choice between them often depends on individual priorities (budget versus ultimate accuracy).
Is the 6.5x47 Lapua Still Worth It?
Considering its exceptional accuracy, flat trajectory, and reduced recoil, the 6.5x47 Lapua remains a highly competitive and effective cartridge. The higher cost and increased barrel wear are drawbacks to consider, but for those prioritizing peak performance in long-range shooting, the benefits often outweigh the drawbacks. The 6.5 Creedmoor presents a more affordable alternative, but the 6.5x47 Lapua still holds its own as a top contender in the realm of precision shooting. Ultimately, the best choice depends on individual needs and budget constraints. For many dedicated long-range shooters, the 6.5x47 Lapua remains a worthwhile investment.